bcm5719-llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint, branch meklort-10.0.1

[lldb][NFC] Migrate FileSpec::Dump to raw_ostream

2019-12-06T08:40:42+00:00

Change Target::FindBreakpointsByName to return Expected

2019-12-04T14:57:15+00:00

Summary: Using a BreakpointList corrupts the breakpoints' IDs because BreakpointList::Add sets the ID, so use a vector instead, and update the signature to return the vector wrapped in an llvm::Expected which can propagate any error from the inner call to StringIsBreakpointName. Note that, despite the similar name, SBTarget::FindBreakpointsByName doesn't suffer the same problem, because it uses a SBBreakpointList, which is more like a BreakpointIDList than a BreakpointList under the covers. Add a check to TestBreakpointNames that, without this fix, notices the ID getting mutated and fails. Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70907

[lldb] s/FileSpec::Equal/FileSpec::Match

2019-12-04T09:42:32+00:00

Summary: The FileSpec class is often used as a sort of a pattern -- one specifies a bare file name to search, and we check if in matches the full file name of an existing module (for example). These comparisons used FileSpec::Equal, which had some support for it (via the full=false argument), but it was not a good fit for this job. For one, it did a symmetric comparison, which makes sense for a function called "equal", but not for typical searches (when searching for "/foo/bar.so", we don't want to find a module whose name is just "bar.so"). This resulted in patterns like: if (FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory())) which would request a "full" match only if the pattern really contained a directory. This worked, but the intended behavior was very unobvious. On top of that, a lot of the code wanted to handle the case of an "empty" pattern, and treat it as matching everything. This resulted in conditions like: if (pattern && !FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory()) which are nearly impossible to decipher. This patch introduces a FileSpec::Match function, which does exactly what most of FileSpec::Equal callers want, an asymmetric match between a "pattern" FileSpec and a an actual FileSpec. Empty paterns match everything, filename-only patterns match only the filename component. I've tried to update all callers of FileSpec::Equal to use a simpler interface. Those that hardcoded full=true have been changed to use operator==. Those passing full=pattern.GetDirectory() have been changed to use FileSpec::Match. There was also a handful of places which hardcoded full=false. I've changed these to use FileSpec::Match too. This is a slight change in semantics, but it does not look like that was ever intended, and it was more likely a result of a misunderstanding of the "proper" way to use FileSpec::Equal. [In an ideal world a "FileSpec" and a "FileSpec pattern" would be two different types, but given how widespread FileSpec is, it is unlikely we'll get there in one go. This at least provides a good starting point by centralizing all matching behavior.] Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70851

[lldb][NFC] Use raw_ostream instead of Stream in Baton::GetDescription

2019-12-02T12:27:21+00:00

Removing raw_ostream here is getting us closer to removing LLDB's Stream class.

[lldb] Remove FileSpec->CompileUnit inheritance

2019-11-29T10:44:45+00:00

Summary: CompileUnit is a complicated class. Having it be implicitly convertible to a FileSpec makes reasoning about it even harder. This patch replaces the inheritance by a simple member and an accessor function. This avoid the need for casting in places where one needed to force a CompileUnit to be treated as a FileSpec, and does not add much verbosity elsewhere. It also fixes a bug where we were wrongly comparing CompileUnit& and a CompileUnit*, which compiled due to a combination of this inheritance and the FileSpec*->FileSpec implicit constructor. Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70827

Modernize the rest of the Find.* API (NFC)

2019-10-17T19:56:40+00:00

This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter were frequently implemented incorrectly. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119 llvm-svn: 375160

Implement serializing scripted breakpoints and their extra args.

2019-10-10T17:44:50+00:00

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68750 llvm-svn: 374394

[lldb][NFC] Remove strange bool parameter from Searcher::SearchCallback

2019-10-10T11:26:51+00:00

Summary: The SearchCallback has a bool parameter that we always set to false, we never use in any callback implementation and that also changes its name from one file to the other (either `containing` and `complete`). It was added in the original LLDB check in, so there isn't any history what this was supposed to be, so let's just remove it. Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, labath Reviewed By: jingham, labath Subscribers: lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68696 llvm-svn: 374313

[lldb] Avoid resource leak

2019-10-08T15:56:02+00:00

Summary: Before the pointer variable `args_dict` was assigned the result of an allocation with `new` and then `args_dict` is passed to `GetValueForKeyAsDictionary` which immediatly and unconditionally assigns `args_dict` to `nullptr`: ``` bool GetValueForKeyAsDictionary(llvm::StringRef key, Dictionary *&result) const { result = nullptr; ``` This caused a memory leak which was found in my coverity scan instance under CID 224753: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/kwk-llvm-project. Reviewers: jankratochvil, teemperor Reviewed By: teemperor Subscribers: teemperor, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68638 llvm-svn: 374071

[lldb][NFC] Remove ArgEntry::ref member

2019-09-13T11:26:48+00:00

The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr. Until then we have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the StringRef. llvm-svn: 371842