bcm5719-llvm/libcxx/include/ostream, branch meklort-10.0.1

Add forward declaration of operator<< in as required.

2019-09-25T18:56:54+00:00

This declaration was previously missing despite appearing in the synopsis. Users are still required to include to get the definition of the streaming operator. llvm-svn: 372909

Implement LWG2221: 'Formatted output for nullptr_t' Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63053

2019-07-01T16:20:25+00:00

llvm-svn: 364802

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo

2019-01-19T10:56:40+00:00

to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that defeated my regular expressions. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351648

Second part of P0482 - char8_t. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55308

2018-12-11T04:35:44+00:00

llvm-svn: 348828

[libcxx] Don't depend on availability markup to provide the streams in the dylib

2018-12-06T00:24:58+00:00

Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not a matter of availability markup. This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of whether visibility annotations are enabled. llvm-svn: 348436

[libcxx] Remove _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY

2018-10-16T19:26:23+00:00

That macro has been defined to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 for many weeks now, so we're actually replacing uses of it for uses of _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 directly. This should not change or break anything since the two macros are 100% equivalent, unless somebody is (incorrectly!) relying on _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY being defined. llvm-svn: 344641

Revert "Implement LWG 2221 - No formatted output operator for nullptr."

2018-09-19T23:31:34+00:00

This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like > Undefined symbols for architecture i386: > "std::__1::basic_ostream >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from: llvm-svn: 342599

Implement LWG 2221 - No formatted output operator for nullptr. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D44263

2018-09-19T18:29:57+00:00

llvm-svn: 342566

[libc++] Take 2: Replace uses of _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY

2018-07-11T23:14:33+00:00

Summary: We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which is actually always defined the same. This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by having one canonical way of doing things. Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems have now been fixed. Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892 llvm-svn: 336866

Revert "[libc++] Replace uses of _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY"

2018-07-05T18:41:50+00:00

This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems: 1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing. 2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and fix the tests before we can go forward with this change. llvm-svn: 336382