bcm5719-llvm/clang/test/SemaObjC, branch meklort-10.0.1

Add a FIXME and corresponding test coverage for some suspicious behavior

2020-01-11T00:12:00+00:00

forming composite ObjC pointer types in comparisons.

[objc_direct] Tigthen checks for direct methods

2019-12-20T18:57:36+00:00

Because the name of a direct method must be agreed upon by the caller and the implementation, certain bad practices that one can get away with when using dynamism are fatal with direct methods. To avoid really weird and unscruttable linker error, tighten the front-end error reporting. Rule 1: Direct methods can only have at most one declaration in an @interface container. Any redeclaration is strictly forbidden. Today some amount of redeclaration is tolerated between the main interface and categories for dynamic methods, but we can't have that. Rule 2: Direct method implementations can only be declared in a matching @interface container: when implemented in the primary @implementation then the declaration must be in the primary @interface or an extension, and when implemented in a category, the declaration must be in the @interface for the same category. Also fix another issue with ObjCMethod::getCanonicalDecl(): when an implementation lives in the primary @interface, then its canonical declaration can be in any extension, even when it's not an accessor. Add Sema tests to cover the new errors, and CG tests to beef up testing around function names for categories and extensions. Radar-Id: Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71694

Set a source location for Objective-C accessor stubs

2019-12-05T20:45:10+00:00

even when there is no explicit synthesize statement. This fixes a regression introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108 that could lead to missing debug locations in cleanup code in synthesized Objective-C++ properties. rdar://57630879 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71084

[Sema] Fix a -Wobjc-signed-char-bool false-positive

2019-11-18T20:15:20+00:00

Unsigned bit-field flags can only have boolean values, so handle that case in Expr::isKnownToHaveBooleanValue. rdar://56256999

Implement attribute((objc_direct)), attribute((objc_direct_members))

2019-11-18T19:48:40+00:00

__attribute__((objc_direct)) is an attribute on methods declaration, and __attribute__((objc_direct_members)) on implementation, categories or extensions. A `direct` property specifier is added (@property(direct) type name) These attributes / specifiers cause the method to have no associated Objective-C metadata (for the property or the method itself), and the calling convention to be a direct C function call. The symbol for the method has enforced hidden visibility and such direct calls are hence unreachable cross image. An explicit C function must be made if so desired to wrap them. The implicit `self` and `_cmd` arguments are preserved, however to maintain compatibility with the usual `objc_msgSend` semantics, 3 fundamental precautions are taken: 1) for instance methods, `self` is nil-checked. On arm64 backends this typically adds a single instruction (cbz x0, ) to the codegen, for the vast majority of the cases when the return type is a scalar. 2) for class methods, because the class may not be realized/initialized yet, a call to `[self self]` is emitted. When the proper deployment target is used, this is optimized to `objc_opt_self(self)`. However, long term we might want to emit something better that the optimizer can reason about. When inlining kicks in, these calls aren't optimized away as the optimizer has no idea that a single call is really necessary. 3) the calling convention for the `_cmd` argument is changed: the caller leaves the second argument to the call undefined, and the selector is loaded inside the body when it's referenced only. As far as error reporting goes, the compiler refuses: - making any overloads direct, - making an overload of a direct method, - implementations marked as direct when the declaration in the interface isn't (the other way around is allowed, as the direct attribute is inherited from the declaration), - marking methods required for protocol conformance as direct, - messaging an unqualified `id` with a direct method, - forming any @selector() expression with only direct selectors. As warnings: - any inconsistency of direct-related calling convention when @selector() or messaging is used, - forming any @selector() expression with a possibly direct selector. Lastly an `objc_direct_members` attribute is added that can decorate `@implementation` blocks and causes methods only declared there (and in no `@interface`) to be automatically direct. When decorating an `@interface` then all methods and properties declared in this block are marked direct. Radar-ID: rdar://problem/2684889 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69991 Reviewed-By: John McCall

Fix two typos in one test name, three days before its 10th birthday! (NFC)

2019-11-08T17:03:46+00:00

Redeclare Objective-C property accessors inside the ObjCImplDecl in which they are synthesized.

2019-11-08T16:23:22+00:00

This patch is motivated by (and factored out from) https://reviews.llvm.org/D66121 which is a debug info bugfix. Starting with DWARF 5 all Objective-C methods are nested inside their containing type, and that patch implements this for synthesized Objective-C properties. 1. SemaObjCProperty populates a list of synthesized accessors that may need to inserted into an ObjCImplDecl. 2. SemaDeclObjC::ActOnEnd inserts forward-declarations for all accessors for which no override was provided into their ObjCImplDecl. This patch does *not* synthesize AST function *bodies*. Moving that code from the static analyzer into Sema may be a good idea though. 3. Places that expect all methods to have bodies have been updated. I did not update the static analyzer's inliner for synthesized properties to point back to the property declaration (see test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/nullability-notes.m.plist), which I believed to be more bug than a feature. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108 rdar://problem/53782400

Revert r374202"[ObjC generics] Fix not inheriting type bounds in categories/extensions."

2019-10-22T20:39:01+00:00

This introduced new errors, see below. Reverting until that can be investigated properly. #import void f(int width, int height) { FourCharCode best_fourcc = kCMPixelFormat_422YpCbCr8_yuvs; NSDictionary* videoSettingsDictionary = @{ (id)kCVPixelBufferPixelFormatTypeKey : @(best_fourcc), }; } $ clang++ -c /tmp/a.mm /tmp/a.mm:6:5: error: cannot initialize a parameter of type 'KeyType _Nonnull const' (aka 'const id') with an rvalue of type 'id' (id)kCVPixelBufferPixelFormatTypeKey : @(best_fourcc), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. > When a category/extension doesn't repeat a type bound, corresponding > type parameter is substituted with `id` when used as a type argument. As > a result, in the added test case it was causing errors like > > > type argument 'T' (aka 'id') does not satisfy the bound ('id') of type parameter 'T' > > We are already checking that type parameters should be consistent > everywhere (see `checkTypeParamListConsistency`) and update > `ObjCTypeParamDecl` to have correct underlying type. And when we use the > type parameter as a method return type or a method parameter type, it is > substituted to the bounded type. But when we use the type parameter as a > type argument, we check `ObjCTypeParamType` that ignores the updated > underlying type and remains `id`. > > Fix by desugaring `ObjCTypeParamType` to the underlying type, the same > way we are doing with `TypedefType`. > > rdar://problem/54329242 > > Reviewers: erik.pilkington, ahatanak > > Reviewed By: erik.pilkington > > Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, cfe-commits > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66696

[ObjC] Diagnose implicit type coercion from ObjC 'Class' to object

2019-10-17T15:27:04+00:00

pointer types. For example, in Objective-C mode, the initialization of 'x' in: ``` @implementation MyType + (void)someClassMethod { MyType *x = self; } @end ``` is correctly diagnosed with an incompatible-pointer-types warning, but in Objective-C++ mode, it is not diagnosed at all -- even though incompatible pointer conversions generally become an error in C++. This patch fixes that oversight, allowing implicit conversions involving Class only to/from unqualified-id, and between qualified and unqualified Class, where the protocols are compatible. Note that this does change some behaviors in Objective-C, as well, as shown by the modified tests. Of particular note is that assignment from from 'Class' to 'id' now warns. (Despite appearances, those are not compatible types. 'Class' is not expected to have instance methods defined by 'MyProtocol', while 'id' is.) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67983 llvm-svn: 375125

[ObjC] Add some additional test cases around pointer conversions.

2019-10-17T15:18:59+00:00

This is especially important for Objective-C++, which is entirely missing this testing at the moment. This annotates with "FIXME" the cases which I change in the next patch -- I primarily wanted to document the current state of things so that the effect of the code change is made clear. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67982 llvm-svn: 375124