bcm5719-llvm/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MPI-Checker, branch meklort-10.0.1

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

2019-09-09T20:34:40+00:00

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an object of the respective type. This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572 llvm-svn: 371450

[analyzer] Fix analyzer warnings on analyzer.

2019-08-28T18:44:38+00:00

Write tests for the actual crash that was found. Write comments and refactor code around 17 style bugs and suppress 3 false positives. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66847 llvm-svn: 370246

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

2019-08-14T23:04:18+00:00

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259 llvm-svn: 368942

[analyzer][NFC] Refactoring BugReporter.cpp P3.: std::shared_pointer -> PathDiagnosticPieceRef

2019-08-13T16:45:48+00:00

find clang/ -type f -exec sed -i 's/std::shared_ptr/PathDiagnosticPieceRef/g' {} \; git diff -U3 --no-color HEAD^ | clang-format-diff-6.0 -p1 -i Just as C++ is meant to be refactored, right? Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65381 llvm-svn: 368717

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

2019-01-26T14:23:08+00:00

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO) function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways. A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker, once it is called, registration is guaranteed. This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more info here: D54438#1315953 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424 llvm-svn: 352277

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo

2019-01-19T08:50:56+00:00

to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

2018-12-15T16:23:51+00:00

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept. It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend, whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend depends on both of those libraries. One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core, it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which is where it ultimately belongs. This move implies that since include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function: class CheckerRegistry; void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry); it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h, which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436 llvm-svn: 349275

[analyzer] Fix the "Zombie Symbols" bug.

2018-11-30T03:27:50+00:00

It's an old bug that consists in stale references to symbols remaining in the GDM if they disappear from other program state sections as a result of any operation that isn't the actual dead symbol collection. The most common example here is: FILE *fp = fopen("myfile.txt", "w"); fp = 0; // leak of file descriptor In this example the leak were not detected previously because the symbol disappears from the public part of the program state due to evaluating the assignment. For that reason the checker never receives a notification that the symbol is dead, and never reports a leak. This patch not only causes leak false negatives, but also a number of other problems, including false positives on some checkers. What's worse, even though the program state contains a finite number of symbols, the set of symbols that dies is potentially infinite. This means that is impossible to compute the set of all dead symbols to pass off to the checkers for cleaning up their part of the GDM. No longer compute the dead set at all. Disallow iterating over dead symbols. Disallow querying if any symbols are dead. Remove the API for marking symbols as dead, as it is no longer necessary. Update checkers accordingly. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18860 llvm-svn: 347953

[analyzer] [NFC] Remove unused parameters, as found by -Wunused-parameter

2018-09-28T18:49:41+00:00

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52640 llvm-svn: 343353

[analyzer] Do not run visitors until the fixpoint, run only once.

2018-06-26T21:12:08+00:00

In the current implementation, we run visitors until the fixed point is reached. That is, if a visitor adds another visitor, the currently processed path is destroyed, all diagnostics is discarded, and it is regenerated again, until it's no longer modified. This pattern has a few negative implications: - This loop does not even guarantee to terminate. E.g. just imagine two visitors bouncing a diagnostics around. - Performance-wise, e.g. for sqlite3 all visitors are being re-run at least 10 times for some bugs. We have already seen a few reports where it leads to timeouts. - If we want to add more computationally intense visitors, this will become worse. - From architectural standpoint, the current layout requires copying visitors, which is conceptually wrong, and can be annoying (e.g. no unique_ptr on visitors allowed). The proposed change is a much simpler architecture: the outer loop processes nodes upwards, and whenever the visitor is added it only processes current nodes and above, thus guaranteeing termination. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47856 llvm-svn: 335666