summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch')
-rw-r--r--package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch42
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch b/package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index c9421ef938..0000000000
--- a/package/uclibc/0007-sys-cdefs.h-add-definition-of-__attribute_alloc_size.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-From dfcc950af1af003ee9e6fc985b5d6b3eb7d408af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:56:30 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] sys/cdefs.h: add definition of __attribute_alloc_size__
-
-Commit cee0b058fa0b4501b289a2da365182d60314d746 ("add aligned_alloc
-required for latest gcc libstdc++") added the prototype of
-aligned_alloc() to <stdlib.h>. This prototype contains
-'__attribute_alloc_size__ ((2))', but this is not defined anywhere in
-uClibc-ng.
-
-This commit addresses that by adding the relevant definition in
-<sys/cdefs.h>, borrowed from glibc.
-
-Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
----
- include/sys/cdefs.h | 9 +++++++++
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/include/sys/cdefs.h b/include/sys/cdefs.h
-index f725ce9..6cd3811 100644
---- a/include/sys/cdefs.h
-+++ b/include/sys/cdefs.h
-@@ -222,6 +222,15 @@
- # define __attribute_malloc__ /* Ignore */
- #endif
-
-+/* Tell the compiler which arguments to an allocation function
-+ indicate the size of the allocation. */
-+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3)
-+# define __attribute_alloc_size__(params) \
-+ __attribute__ ((__alloc_size__ params))
-+#else
-+# define __attribute_alloc_size__(params) /* Ignore. */
-+#endif
-+
- /* At some point during the gcc 2.96 development the `pure' attribute
- for functions was introduced. We don't want to use it unconditionally
- (although this would be possible) since it generates warnings. */
---
-2.7.4
-
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud