summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch')
-rw-r--r--package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch25
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch b/package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index bfc586034e..0000000000
--- a/package/pcre/0003-fix-CVE-2014-8964.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-Description: CVE-2014-8964, heap buffer overflow
- Heap buffer overflow if an assertion with a zero minimum repeat is used as
- the condition in a conditional group.
-Origin: upstream http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1546
-Bug: http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1546
-Applied-Upstream: Yes, after 8.36
-
-Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
----
-This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
---- a/pcre_exec.c
-+++ b/pcre_exec.c
-@@ -1404,8 +1404,11 @@
- condition = TRUE;
-
- /* Advance ecode past the assertion to the start of the first branch,
-- but adjust it so that the general choosing code below works. */
-+ but adjust it so that the general choosing code below works. If the
-+ assertion has a quantifier that allows zero repeats we must skip over
-+ the BRAZERO. This is a lunatic thing to do, but somebody did! */
-
-+ if (*ecode == OP_BRAZERO) ecode++;
- ecode += GET(ecode, 1);
- while (*ecode == OP_ALT) ecode += GET(ecode, 1);
- ecode += 1 + LINK_SIZE - PRIV(OP_lengths)[condcode];
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud